SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Chandigarh Heritage Conservation Committee to distribute share wise property

#Top Stories#India#Chandigarh
PNT Reporter | Last Updated : 3rd Apr, 2023
Synopsis

Mayor Anup Gupta has expressed his support for registering properties by shares. During a meeting with UT Adviser Dharam Pal, Gupta discussed concerns related to the buying and selling of shares in properties and obtaining permission for temporary roofs in the central courtyards. The CHCC is scheduled to convene next week to deliberate on the Supreme Court’s ruling against apartmentalisation and determine the next steps for implementing the order in its entirety.

Shortly before the important meeting of the Chandigarh Heritage Conservation Committee (CHCC), Mayor Anup


Gupta has expressed his support for registering properties by shares. During a meeting with UT Adviser Dharam Pal at

the UT Secretariat, Gupta discussed concerns related to the buying and selling of shares in properties and obtaining

permission for temporary roofs in the central courtyards. The CHCC is scheduled to convene next week to deliberate

on the Supreme Court’s ruling against apartmentalisation and determine the next steps for implementing the order in

its entirety.

During the meeting, Gupta brought up these concerns, stating that families in Chandigarh are using their entire life

savings and earnings to buy and sell shares. Many of these families have taken out loans from banks to make these

purchases and rely on their pension for their livelihood.

Gupta went on to explain that some of these families may need to sell their property shares to pay for their children’s

education, their own healthcare needs, their children’s weddings, or to ensure their own financial stability in old age.

This is something they have worked hard for to ensure they have a home to live in and can meet their family’s needs

with dignity.

Gupta questioned how the urbanization of the population would be affected by those who rent or own property shares.

The mayor stated that the citizens in question have not broken any laws established by the UT administration, as they

have followed the regulations and constructed their buildings in accordance with the bye-laws. Regardless of whether

the building is owned or tenanted, the area and height remain the same, which also means the pressure on

infrastructure is equal. The mayor questioned why there should be a different approach for owners and tenants.

The mayor emphasized that these families have worked hard to accumulate their earnings and secure a permanent

home for themselves, while also fulfilling their family responsibilities with dignity. The mayor also raised the question

of how living in rented accommodations or having a share of property affects the overall population density of the

city.

The mayor clarified that none of the city’s residents had violated any laws or regulations set by the government. The

rules regarding the area, height of buildings, and other factors were the same for both property owners and tenants.

Moreover, the mayor requested permission from the adviser to install temporary or retractable roofs in the open

central courtyards of showrooms located in Sectors 7, 8, and 26, arguing that this would not result in any additional

Floor Area Ratio (FAR).

However, on January 10 th , the Supreme Court declared that the first 30 sectors of Chandigarh were part of the heritage

zone of Le Corbusier and therefore, converting residential properties into floor-wise apartments was not permitted in

these sectors. As a result, numerous share-wise property agreements were deemed null and void.

Have something to say? Post your comment