SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Mumbai police uncover INR 150 crore housing possession fraud linked to HDIL

#Law & Policy#India#Maharashtra#Mumbai City
Mumbai News Desk | Last Updated : 10th Mar, 2026
Synopsis

Mumbai Police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) has revealed an alleged housing fraud worth around INR 150 crore involving the Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd (HDIL) Group. Investigators claim possession documents meant for about 1,000 slum rehabilitation residents in Bharat Nagar were sold to third-party buyers, allowing unauthorised occupancy in prime transit flats at Kurla Premier. Former HDIL officials provided key statements linking the sale to company leadership, although promoters Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan have denied direct involvement. The case adds to HDIL's history of legal and financial scrutiny, including insolvency and earlier fraud probes.

Mumbai Police's EOW has filed a chargesheet exposing an alleged housing scam worth approximately INR 150 crore, involving possession documents of transit flats intended for at least 1,000 slum rehabilitation residents in Bharat Nagar. The documents were reportedly sold to third-party buyers, allowing unauthorised occupants to reside in prime transit housing in Mumbai. The HDIL Group, led by Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan, is at the centre of the investigation, though their legal representatives have denied direct involvement in these transactions.


A former HDIL officer, Chandrashekhar Dinappa Gowda, explained that the company had redeveloped nearly 3,000 slum structures across nine societies in Bharat Nagar. Of these, almost 2,000 huts were vacated for the project. The company allegedly purchased document files for about 1,500 shanties, including those belonging to eligible, ineligible, or unlisted residents. These files were stored in the accounts department and, starting around 2011, were allegedly sold for INR 15-16 lakh each. Buyers often provided pre-signed cheques, which were processed by senior officials, and possession letters were issued for transit flats in buildings 5 and 6 of the Kurla Premier project.

The flats were originally leased from the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to house residents displaced by airport construction. About 1,200 residents were shifted to the transit camp, but investigators later found many original beneficiaries untraceable, with several flats occupied by those who had purchased hutment files unlawfully. EOW officials are examining whether any payments were made to the original slum dwellers whose documents were sold.

Investigations also revealed that HDIL allegedly defaulted on rental payments for these flats between August 2014 and March 2016, resulting in dues of nearly INR 44 crore. Complaints led to an FIR at Vinoba Bhave Nagar police station last year under sections for cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. The case was later transferred to the EOW, which reviewed project documents, financial records, and statements from over 60 witnesses before filing the chargesheet.

Both Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan have denied direct involvement in selling possession files, stating that the project was managed by designated officials and they were not involved in daily operations. Investigators are also scrutinising financial records and company transactions, noting HDIL faced financial distress and entered insolvency proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has conducted a separate probe into the company's financial dealings.

Lawyers for the Wadhawans have maintained that accusations regarding the sale of the shanties will be addressed in court once evidence is presented. This case adds to a series of legal and financial investigations into HDIL, including earlier probes linked to PMC Bank defaults, alleged misreporting, and asset attachments involving the promoters.

Have something to say? Post your comment