Advertisement
When should a housing society in Mumbai start considering re...
From GST on JDAs to SEBI’s REIT reclassification and the S...
Stay ahead in the world of real estate with our daily podcas...
Stay ahead in the world of real estate with our daily podcas...
The Bombay High Court has upheld a deemed conveyance order granted to Corporate Centre Premises Co-operative Society Ltd, reinforcing statutory protections for cooperative societies over competing private contractual claims by developers. The developer, Krishna Developers, had challenged the conveyance on the basis that its contractual rights for future development were being adversely affected. However, the court ruled that the statutory obligations under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA) take precedence over private agreements once construction is complete, all Floor Space Index (FSI) has been utilised and occupancy certificates have been issued. Justice Amit Borkar clarified that private contracts cannot override clear legislative mandates that protect society rights, and that objections related to internal society management should be dealt with under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The ruling reinforces the legal framework for resolving longstanding conveyance disputes in Mumbai's real estate sector.
The Bombay High Court has affirmed a deemed conveyance order in favour of Corporate Centre Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., a commercial cooperative society based in Andheri East, Mumbai, rejecting a challenge from developer Krishna Developers that sought to undermine the society's statutory right to ownership of the property. Advertisement
A deemed conveyance is a legal mechanism under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA) that transfers the property title including land and constructed structures to a cooperative society when a builder fails to execute a conveyance deed within the required statutory timeline after completing construction and obtaining occupancy certificates. The system aims to protect the interests of flat purchasers and ensure that society members gain control over property they have effectively paid for.
In this case, the society had applied for deemed conveyance after the developer delayed executing the conveyance deed, despite completing construction, utilising all available Floor Space Index (FSI) and obtaining necessary occupation certificates. Krishna Developers challenged the deeming order, arguing that its contractual rights over future development were being adversely affected by the conveyance. The developer's contention was that private agreements between the promoter and purchasers should prevail over the statutory conveyance process.
Delivering the judgment, Justice Amit Borkar clarified that statutory obligations under MOFA cannot be overridden by private contractual stipulations. The court emphasised that once the statutory conditions for conveyance are met, including completion of construction and utilisation of FSI, the developer's obligation to convey the property to the society becomes absolute, and any residual contractual rights claimed by a promoter cannot supersede this obligation. The court further observed that private contracts cannot nullify or dilute clear legislative mandates designed to protect the rights of cooperative societies and individual owners.
The court also addressed peripheral concerns raised by the developer regarding internal society management issues, noting that such matters should be resolved under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act rather than being used to invalidate the conveyance process. This distinction reinforces the principle that procedural disputes over society governance do not negate the underlying statutory entitlement to property ownership once foundational conditions for conveyance have been satisfied.
Legal experts said the ruling strengthens the enforceability of MOFA provisions in conveyance disputes and provides clarity on the hierarchy between legislative obligations and private agreements in real estate matters. It also underscores the judiciary's role in ensuring that statutory protections accorded to cooperative societies are upheld, particularly in Mumbai's complex and often protracted property conveyance litigation landscape.
Observers noted that the decision could have broader implications for ongoing conveyance disputes across the metropolitan region, where delayed conveyance and litigation involving contractual rights versus statutory obligations have long been a source of contention between societies, developers and individual owners.
5th Jun, 2025
25th May, 2023
11th May, 2023
27th Apr, 2023
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
