SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Chintels Paradiso builder proposes phased redevelopment for unsafe and habitable towers

#Builders & Projects#India
PNT Reporter | Last Updated : 5th Dec, 2024
Synopsis

The builder of Chintels Paradiso in Gurugram has applied for phased redevelopment of the Sector 109 society. The plan aims to reconstruct six unsafe towers and repair habitable ones separately, potentially expediting the process for affected residents. Two additional towers identified as unsafe by an independent audit remain unclassified as uninhabitable. While some homebuyers view this approach as promising, concerns linger regarding reconstruction timelines, layout changes, and safety measures. Residents are closely monitoring developments, hoping for clarity on how the plan will address their long-standing uncertainties.

The builder of Chintels Paradiso has submitted an application to the Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) for phased redevelopment of the society. A report is expected to be sent to the enforcement wing of the department in Gurugram soon.


If approved, the proposal will allow the reconstruction of towers deemed unsafe at the Sector 109 society in one phase, while repairing those considered habitable in another. Of the nine towers in Paradiso, six have been declared unsafe by the district administration. An independent audit conducted by the Central Building Research Institute (CBRI), commissioned by the builder, also identified two additional towers as unsafe, although they were not officially classified as uninhabitable.

The builder claims that this phased approach will accelerate the reconstruction of unsafe towers. Meanwhile, homebuyers are closely monitoring the developments, as the phased strategy may impact the timelines for both reconstruction and repairs.

For residents of the unsafe towers who opted for reconstruction, the proposal could mean receiving their homes sooner. On the other hand, those in the habitable towers are keen to understand how potential changes in the layout or infrastructural upgrades might affect them, particularly whether such changes would require their consent.

A resident of one of the habitable towers expressed concerns, stating that they had endured prolonged uncertainty. They acknowledged the phased redevelopment as a potential step forward but emphasised worries about the timeline and whether the redevelopment would effectively resolve safety concerns.

The phased redevelopment proposal for Chintels Paradiso offers a glimmer of hope for residents affected by unsafe living conditions. By separating reconstruction and repair work, the plan could reduce delays for those in uninhabitable towers while addressing structural concerns in habitable ones. However, questions about timelines, infrastructure upgrades, and the inclusion of residents in decision-making remain critical. The success of this initiative will depend on effective implementation, timely approvals, and transparent communication between the builder and homebuyers.

Have something to say? Post your comment